Can a superseded unit of competency be used toward recognition of prior learning (RPL) for a current unit of competency? (Clause 1.12)

Yes, a superseded non-equivalent unit of competency can be used as part of an RPL process toward the award of a current unit of competency.

However, currency is a particular risk with recognition of prior learning. Your RTO may be presented with evidence gathered over a number of years, including evidence of competency from a superseded non-equivalent unit of competency. This does not mean the superseded non-equivalent unit is not valid; however, you must ensure there is sufficient evidence of the person’s competence at the time you make the assessment decision.

For example, if a learner is applying for recognition of prior learning for the unit SHBXCCS007 Conduct salon financial transactions and provides evidence of previously completing the superseded non-equivalent unit SHBXCCS001 - Conduct salon financial transactions, your RTO should:

• Consider all of the requirements of the unit SHBXCCS007 and compare them to the skills awarded in SHBXCCS001 (refer to the mapping information provided within the SHB v4.0 Training Package for guidance).
• Identify any additional forms of evidence the student could provide to demonstrate competence.
• Ensure the total evidence provided by the learner shows they have current skills and knowledge in all requirements of SHBXCCS007.
• Retain all evidence collected during the process.

If the learner has been awarded a previous unit of competency which is deemed superseded and equivalent, please see ASQA’s position on awarding credit transfer here.