Overseas audits are charged as follows:
- base rate of $1000, and
- $250 per hour after the first four hours, and
- any ASQA official travel costs, and
- any additional reasonable expenses incurred by ASQA relating to the overseas part of the audit.
Overseas audits are charged as follows:
Please send an email explaining the details of the change to enquiries [at] asqa.gov.au. ASQA will contact you about what happens next.
Yes—you must submit two applications to add the items to your registered training organisation (RTO) registration and to your Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students (CRICOS) registration.
ASQA advises providers to submit these applications simultaneously. (ASQA does not require you to wait for the RTO application to be approved before submitting the CRICOS application and providers who do so are not eligible for the fee exemption discussed below).
Fee exemptions for applicants submitting RTO/CRICOS change of scope applications.
Application fees apply to both of these applications; however, the ASQA schedule of fees 2015 allows ASQA to offer an exemption from the lower of the two application fees when the two applications are submitted simultaneously.
In practice, this means that the RTO application should be submitted using ASQAnet, and the CRICOS application should be emailed or faxed to ASQA within one business day of the RTO application being submitted. This allows ASQA to process the applications concurrently, and reduces the cost of processing the applications.
If you are dissatisfied with a decision made by ASQA, for example, to reject your application for initial registration, you have a number of options:
ASQA cannot provide advice on funding.
ASQA’s role as the national vocational education and training (VET) regulator is to register VET and Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students (CRICOS) providers and accredit VET courses.
There are a range of funding bodies in different states and territories. State/territory governments provide funding for VET in various ways, and Australian Government funding is for the most part provided through agreements with those state/territory governments.
Providers are advised to contact their state funding body or state training department for information on funding.
ASQA works with the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) and with the Australian Government Department of Education, to regulate multi-sector providers.
Through the arrangements outlined in a memorandum of understanding agreed between ASQA and TEQSA in 2011, the agencies seek to implement the following principles in the regulation of multi-sector providers:
ASQA regulates training providers against the vocational education and training (VET) Quality Framework and has no jurisdiction over regulatory requirements of other authorities. Similarly, other authorities such as state occupational health and safety regulators or Work Safe Australia do not have the authority to mandate requirements for delivery of nationally recognised training. However, these authorities may refuse to recognise qualifications or statements of attainment which have been issued by providers that do not meet their standards.
Providers that come under the jurisdiction of multiple industry regulators may need to comply with multiple requirements. If ASQA is notified of conflicting requirements, ASQA's Industry Engagement team works with relevant authorities to address these conflicts.
Training organisations in Victoria and Western Australia can only register with ASQA if they fall within ASQA's jurisdiction.
If your organisation is currently registered with the Victorian or West Australian regulator, but falls within ASQA’s jurisdiction, you should contact your current regulator and apply for a transfer to ASQA. The transfer is a simple process that does not attract any fees.;
If you are in Victoria or Western Australia, and are applying for initial registration as a registered training organisation, you should apply to ASQA if you will be operating within ASQA’s jurisdiction.
Your organisation falls within ASQA’s jurisdiction if:
ASQA regulates those registered training organisations in Victoria and Western Australia that:
ASQA publishes information about certain decisions in the Regulatory decisions list.
ASQA publishes information about:
These decisions are only published after all reconsideration and review activity is complete.
ASQA may also contact funding bodies or other relevant government agencies with this information.
If ASQA identifies non-compliance, you will be given 20 working days to provide evidence that you have rectified that non-compliance.
ASQA will then consider this evidence. If you remain non-compliant with the required standards, ASQA will make a decision about what actions to take next. In making this decision, ASQA will consider your history of compliance and the risks associated with the non-compliance.
Actions might include:
The National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act 2011 provides a range of sanctions of increasing severity—escalating from enforceable undertakings and additional conditions on registration through to suspending or cancelling the registration of a registered training organisation (RTO).
No—it is the licensing body that will issue a license. The licensing body may set additional requirements for obtaining a license.
As a registered training organisation, you may issue a statement of attainment to students that have met the requirements of a unit of competency. However, this alone does not indicate eligibility for a licence.
Students and providers can find more information on the requirements for obtaining licenses from the relevant licensing bodies.
ASQA provides detailed guidance on what compliance with the Standards might look like in its publications, which include:
However, the information in these documents provides guidance only. It’s important to understand that the VET Quality Framework, which includes the Standards for RTOs 2015, does not prescribe how an RTO must demonstrate compliance. As such, what compliance will look like will vary for each provider, depending on factors including scope of registration, student cohorts, delivery modes, and so on. ASQA cannot provide a one-size-fits-all guide to compliance for all RTOs. Rather, each RTO has the autonomy to determine the best practices that suit their business model.
Your Compliance History is simply an indicator of your history of compliance with core regulatory obligations and is one of many indicators that ASQA uses to profile your provider.
An RTO that has an ongoing history of meeting all regulatory requirements, including data provision and fee payment requirements, is more likely to have a stronger compliance history.
ASQA can release certain information to the public if satisfied that the release of the information would reasonably inform a person’s choice to enrol as a VET student with a registered training organisation, encourage improvement in the quality of vocational education and training services provided, or encourage compliance with the VET Quality Framework.
ASQA publishes a list of regulatory decisions it has taken in relation to specific providers.
ASQA does not publish or share providers’ Compliance Histories as these are only one indicator that feeds into a provider’s profile and may be subject to misinterpretation as an endorsement or an indicator of provider quality.
No, your Compliance History is not reviewable. Your Compliance History is drawn from finalised audit and complaint activity and your compliance with data reporting requirements, payments to ASQA of fees and charges and submission of your annual declaration of compliance. Your Compliance History is updated regularly and may change as a result of newly finalised regulatory activity.
You can find out your Compliance History category by emailing enquiries [at] asqa.gov.au. The enquiry must be sent by one of your organisation’s registered email contacts, as listed on training.gov.au.
For privacy reasons, ASQA is unable to provide information on your organisation’s Compliance History over the phone.
ASQA has advised relevant bodies that risk ratings are no longer available.
You may refer third parties seeking your risk rating to ASQA’s website which advises that ASQA no longer applies risk ratings to providers.
Risk ratings are often used in transactional regulatory models where regulation focuses largely on assessing applications for approval. ASQA’s regulatory approach has shifted from a transactional model to a risk-based model, which relies on the analysis of data and intelligence and the identification of risks posed at both the system and provider levels.
It’s important to note that your Compliance History is a historical indicator, rather than an indicator of the current quality of a provider. So your Compliance History may be affected when new information about your provider is received. If your provider fails to meet regulatory requirements or makes substantial improvements in meeting requirements, your Compliance History may change.
Yes. Nominal hours are also referred to as supervised hours for course accreditation. Nominal hours represent the supervised, structured learning and assessment activity required to sufficiently address the content of each unit.
Yes—fees depend on the number of accredited courses. Refer to ASQA’s Guide to fees for more information.
The Assessor competencies identified in a course must ensure RTOs will meet the requirements of the Standards for Registered Training Organisations 2015.
No, a learner must satisfy all entry requirements, including holding specified units of competency, prior to commencing the course.
Yes—there are many accredited courses that provide training and assessment to address an outcome in the same area. However, you cannot accredit a course to address an outcome that can be achieved via a training package.
Units from the Foundation Skills Training Package can be included in accredited courses if they are relevant to the vocational outcome of the accredited course.
Pre-requisite unit relationships must be defined within the course structure at Section B: 5.1. This must include any pre-requisite requirements for imported training package units or units from an existing accredited course. Learners must be deemed competent in a pre-requisite unit prior to the determination of competency in the associated unit/s. Advice to RTOs on the sequence of delivery of the accredited course must also be provided within the course structure. For example, knowledge-based units should be completed prior to units requiring the application of practical skills.
Course Developers may utilise a consultant to develop a course; however, ASQA does not endorse any particular consultants. Industry bodies such as Velg and the Australian Council for Private Education and Training (ACPET) publish lists of consultants that may help you find a suitable consultant.
The possession of a current blue card or a police check can be included as an entry requirement into accredited courses. Course owners will need to provide a rationale for including this entry requirement if it prevents a student from undertaking work placement.
Trigger words that align to foundation skills may be used in the performance criteria. If foundation skills are not explicit in the performance criteria they must be identified in the ‘Foundation skills’ field of the unit of competency.