Skip to main content
  • RTO Standards Guide
  • Accredited Course Standards Guide
  • asqanet
  • asqaconnect
Australian Government Australian Skills Quality Authority
  • Contact us
  • News & Events
  • Complaints

Main navigation

  • RTOs
    Close
    RTOs
    • What is an RTO?
    • How to become an RTO
      • Prepare your RTO application
      • Submit your RTO registration application
      • How we assess RTO applications
      • RTO application decision
    • Renew RTO registration
      • How to renew your registration
      • How we assess your registration renewal
    • Change RTO scope
      • Change RTO scope | Add training products
      • Change RTO scope | TAE Training Package evidence
      • Change RTO scope | Application process
      • Change RTO scope | Remove training products
      • When training products change
    • Withdraw registration
    • Requirements and responsibilities
      • Complying with legislation
      • Complying with ASQA requirements
      • Qualifications and statements of attainment
      • Data collection and provision
      • Other licensing and registration requirements
    • Change RTO details
      • Change business address
      • Change key staff or their contact details
      • Change legal or business name
      • Change scope of registration
      • Change to financial status
      • Change to legal entity type, ownership, and mergers
      • Changes due to COVID-19
      • Keep delivery locations updated
    • Focus on compliance - Spotlight On
      • Series 1 | Trainers and assessors
      • Series 2 | Assessment Validation
      • Series 3 | Assessment
      • Series 4 | Student support
    • Users’ guide to the Standards for RTOs 2015
      • Introduction to the RTO standards users' guide
      • Chapter 1—Marketing and recruitment
      • Chapter 2—Enrolment
      • Chapter 3—Support and progression
      • Chapter 4—Training and assessment
      • Chapter 5—Completion
      • Chapter 6—Regulatory compliance and governance practice
      • Appendix 1—Index to Standards/clauses as referenced in the users’ guide
      • Self-assessment tool
    • ASQA delegations
    • More support
  • ESOS providers
    Close
    ESOS providers
    • What is an ESOS provider?
    • How to become an ESOS provider
      • Prepare your ESOS application
      • Submit your application
      • How we assess ESOS applications
      • ESOS application decision
    • ESOS requirements
      • Legislative obligations
      • Quality of training experience
      • Maintaining your registration
      • Reporting obligations summary
      • Provider default obligations
      • Education agents
      • Tuition fee obligations
    • English-language courses (ELICOS)
    • Change ESOS registration
      • Change ESOS registration | Documentation requirements
      • Change ESOS registration | Fees
      • Change ESOS registration | Application process
    • Renew registration
    • Change CRICOS details
    • How we process applications
    • Withdraw registration
    • More support
  • Course accreditation
    Close
    Course accreditation
    • What is an accredited course?
    • Apply for course accreditation
      • Step 1—VET course concept
      • Step 2—Course development
      • Step 3—Course submission
      • Step 4—Application assessment
      • Step 5—Decision
      • Users’ guide to developing a course document
    • Manage a course
      • Amend a course
      • Cancel a course
      • Extend a course
    • Renew a course
      • Step 1—Intention to renew
      • Step 2—Course redevelopment
      • Step 3—Submit course renewal
      • Step 4—Application assessment (renewal)
      • Step 5—Decision (renewal)
    • Course owner responsibilities
    • Users’ guide to the Standards for VET Accredited Courses
      • Foreword
      • About the Standards
      • About this guide
      • National course document template
      • Standards
      • Accredited courses guide appendices
    • More support—Course accreditation
  • Training package assurance
  • Students
    Close
    Students
    • How ASQA can help students
    • Choosing a course and provider
    • Provider closures
    • Student records
    • Complaints about providers
    • More support
      • Courses and providers
  • Guidance & resources
    Close
    Guidance & resources
    • Focus on compliance - Spotlight On
      • Series 1 | Trainers and assessors
      • Series 2 | Assessment Validation
      • Series 3 | Assessment
      • Series 4 | Student support
    • Third-party agreements
      • Third-party written agreements
      • Third-party agreements for VET in schools
    • Annual declaration on compliance
    • Practical training and assessment
    • Online learning
      • Planning online learning
      • Marketing and enrolment for online learning
      • Online student support
      • Online training and assessment
    • Managing natural disaster and pandemics
    • Resources
      • Users' guide to Standards for RTOs 2015
      • Users’ guide to developing a course document
      • Accredited Course Standards Guide
      • Fact sheets
      • FAQs
      • Forms
      • Guidance for Providers
      • Guides and tools
      • Presentations
      • Publications
      • Videos and webinars
  • How we regulate
    Close
    How we regulate
    • Our approach
    • Risk-based regulation
    • Regulatory priorities
      • ASQA's regulatory risk priorities 2022-23
      • Setting our Regulatory Risk Priorities
    • Self-assurance
      • Towards self-assurance
      • Draft model for self-assurance
      • Building a shared understanding of self-assurance
    • Strategic reviews
      • Past strategic reviews
    • Our regulatory practice
    • How we engage and educate
      • Provider Roundtable
      • Stakeholder Liaison Group
      • Consultation
    • Performance assessment (audit)
      • How to prepare for a performance assessment
      • During your performance assessment
      • After your performance assessment: If you’re compliant
      • After your performance assessment: If you’re non-compliant
    • Provider profiles
  • About us
    Close
    About us
    • ASQA overview
      • Our role
      • Our values
      • Key legislation
      • Our leadership and organisation
      • National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Advisory Council
      • Work with us
    • VET sector overview
      • National register of VET
      • Training Package Assurance
      • Training packages
    • Fees and charges
      • Current ASQA fees and charges
      • Annual registration charge
      • Transition arrangements
      • Cost Recovery Implementation Statement (CRIS)
      • How we consult on fees and charges
      • ELICOS fee relief
    • Reporting and accountability
      • Annual reports
      • Corporate Plan
      • Gifts and benefits register
      • Consultation
      • Service standards
      • Surveys
      • Corporate publications
      • Privacy policy
      • APS employee census results
      • Financial reporting
      • Freedom of information
      • Harradine report
      • Information publication scheme
      • Child Safety Policy
    • Contact us
      • Office locations
    • Complaints
      • Complaints about training providers
      • Complaints about ASQA
      • More support
    • Using this website
      • Accessibility
      • Disclaimer
      • Site map
      • Copyright
  • Contact us
  • News & Events
  • Complaints
Self-assurance
  • Towards self-assurance
  • Draft model for self-assurance
  • Building a shared understanding of self-assurance
  • Home
  • How we regulate
  • Self-assurance
  • Building a shared understanding of self-assurance

Building a shared understanding of self-assurance

ASQA released the Working together towards effective self-assurance consultation paper on 3 August 2020 in response to the recommendations made in the Rapid Review of the Australian Skills Quality Authority Regulatory Practices and Processes (Rapid Review). Public feedback on the consultation was open until 31 August 2020.

The information in this document outlines the feedback ASQA received through our initial consultation. This information is also available to view as a PDF.

Consultation paper approach

The consultation paper outlined a summary of phased work we are planning to shift sector practices, our expectations and our regulatory approach towards a greater focus on provider self-assurance.

Our initial focus has been on raising awareness, and building understanding and insights to help define self-assurance. Gathering and sharing examples of provider self-assurance and continuous improvement practice will further support a collective understanding.

Further steps towards effective self-assurance will include:

  • Revising the Annual Declaration on Compliance to better promote and support provider self-assurance and continuous improvement culture and practices.
  • Building trust, so that providers feel comfortable in sharing the ways in which they are seeking to understand their performance and the improvements they are making.
  • Identifying and understanding common areas of improvement will be important for us in developing targeted advice and guidance to help providers build effective self-assurance culture, capability and practice.
  • Sharing information about risks to enable providers to critically review their own practice in these areas and make any necessary improvements.

The anticipated outcome of these actions is that providers are put in a better position to develop effective self-assurance systems for identifying risks to quality outcomes and fixing problems as they arise. Stronger assurance and oversight of their own performance will enable providers to continuously improve vocational education and training practices and deliver quality outcomes for students and employers.

As a self-assurance mindset is embedded in a provider’s culture and systems, ASQA can have greater confidence that the provider has demonstrated the capacity and motivation to manage risks and continuously improve. This will inform the nature and frequency of our compliance monitoring and support us to focus on areas and providers of greatest risk.

Contributor overview

We received a total of 65 submissions. The graph below shows how many submissions we received in each stakeholder category.

A pie chart of contributors to ASQA self-assurance by stakeholder type. Community-based adult education provider (2), Enterprise RTO (8), Privately operated RTO (40), Professional association	 (1), Secondary school (2), TAFE, skills institute or polytechnic (7), Other (5).

What we heard

The consultation paper posed three questions to gather feedback on our move towards an increased focus on provider self-assurance in the coming years. Summaries of the feedback provided for each question are provided below.

Question 1: In order to increase the focus on effective self-assurance, what actions or outcomes do you think should be included in the short, medium and long-term?

Responses to this question reinforced the need for ASQA to provide more information on the concept of self-assurance. There was also a clear call for examples, guidance and tools to support providers in developing their understanding and capability in this area.

Longer-term, submissions indicated a desire for ASQA to recognise good practice and differentiate our regulatory treatment for providers effectively self-assuring, and for ASQA to consider how compliance with other regulatory regimes could be used to support monitoring providers’ performance. There was also some suggestion that there should be stronger governance and accountability requirements for positions of influence within providers.

Question 2: Can you provide examples of how providers already employ effective self-assurance mechanisms, to help build the capability of the sector?

Overwhelmingly, respondents reported a program of internal audits and/or self-assessments, and continuous improvement registers or plans as self-assurance mechanisms. The exception to this was that smaller-sized organisations (less than 100 students) reported being more likely to employ outside support (e.g. external auditing organisations) to conduct internal audits or self-assessments.

Other more frequently used mechanisms included:

  1. governance boards or education committees to oversee multiple regulatory requirements (e.g. standards and industry, government or financial requirements) and dedicated compliance staff or working groups to monitor performance and compliance with regulatory requirements
  2. ensuring learner and industry needs are met through:
    • feedback from students, staff and industry (including quality indicator surveys)
    • involving industry in the design, implementation and review of programs
    • regular analysis of data (progress, completion, complaints)
    • focusing on the needs of industry and beyond compliance with standards
    • providing specialist support for diverse student needs.
  3. pre- and post-course validation and moderation activities, involving a range of internal and external stakeholders and, at times, across sites
  4. networks to share information and resources, to ensure staff develop capability and understand compliance requirements, and to maintain staff currency
  5. internal and ongoing professional development to develop capability and maintain currency.

Analysis of responses suggests that while providers use a myriad of mechanisms to self-assure, there was limited distinction between the types of mechanisms used by providers based on size.

Question 3: How could the annual RTO declaration be improved to build provider self-assurance capability? Suggestions may include ways to critically reflect on practice or identifying other ways to improve.

There were two distinct approaches suggested for improvements to the Annual Declaration on Compliance:

  1. To require providers to account for how they are self-assuring and actions taken to respond to deficiencies identified.
  2. To collect and share examples of good practice in self-assurance and continuous improvement, particularly beyond the requirement of the standards.

There were also suggestions to refine the number of questions asked with a focus on specific parts of the student journey, broader risks or indicators of self-assurance.

There were mixed views about the frequency of completion—some wanted more often, while others sought it to be undertaken less often. Additionally, changes were suggested to functionality of the online annual declaration form to enable it to be completed over time and by more than one person. Guidance to support completion of the declaration was also suggested, as was the idea of independent external sign-off.

Next steps in working together towards effective self-assurance

The information we have gathered through the self-assurance consultation paper process will be used to drive further discussion and consultation with stakeholders towards creating a shared understanding of requirements.

In response to the call for more information on self-assurance, ASQA will work with a subgroup of the Stakeholder Liaison Group (SLG) and peak provider representative bodies to understand how to build better understanding and capability in this area. ASQA will also work with providers to develop self-assurance examples and case studies for sharing.

In revising the Annual Declaration on Compliance for 2021, ASQA will consider the consultation feedback, findings and recommendations of the Rapid Review and the practice of other regulatory agencies. ASQA will also work with the SLG and peak provider representative bodies to test thinking and the implementation of revisions.

If you have a question or comment on this initial self-assurance consultation feedback, please contact us.

Was this page helpful?

Share

Print
Australian Government Australian Skills Quality Authority
Logo Working Together

Footer

  • RTOs
  • Guidance & Resources
  • How we regulate
  • About Us
  • CRICOS
  • RTO standards
  • Our regulatory practice
  • Contact us
  • Students
  • Course accreditation
  • Privacy
  • Using this website

Subscribe to our newsletter

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
Logo Working Together
Flag TI Aboriginal flag

The Australian Skills Quality Authority acknowledges the traditional owners and custodians of country throughout Australia and acknowledges their continuing connection to land, sea and community. We pay our respects to the people, the cultures and the elders past, present and emerging.