Skip to main content
  • RTO Standards Guide
  • Accredited Course Standards Guide
  • asqanet
  • asqaconnect
Australian Government Australian Skills Quality Authority
  • Contact us
  • News & Events
  • Complaints

Main navigation

  • RTOs
    Close
    RTOs
    • What is an RTO?
    • How to become an RTO
      • Prepare your RTO application
      • Submit your RTO registration application
      • How we assess RTO applications
      • RTO application decision
    • Renew RTO registration
      • How to renew your registration
      • How we assess your registration renewal
    • Change RTO scope
      • Change RTO scope | Add training products
      • Change RTO scope | TAE Training Package evidence
      • Change RTO scope | Application process
      • Change RTO scope | Remove training products
      • When training products change
    • Withdraw registration
    • Requirements and responsibilities
      • Complying with legislation
      • Complying with ASQA requirements
      • Qualifications and statements of attainment
      • Data collection and provision
      • Other licensing and registration requirements
    • Change RTO details
      • Change business address
      • Change key staff or their contact details
      • Change legal or business name
      • Change scope of registration
      • Change to financial status
      • Change to legal entity type, ownership, and mergers
      • Changes due to COVID-19
      • Keep delivery locations updated
    • Focus on compliance - Spotlight On
      • Series 1 | Trainers and assessors
      • Series 2 | Assessment Validation
      • Series 3 | Assessment
      • Series 4 | Student support
    • Users’ guide to the Standards for RTOs 2015
      • Introduction to the RTO standards users' guide
      • Chapter 1—Marketing and recruitment
      • Chapter 2—Enrolment
      • Chapter 3—Support and progression
      • Chapter 4—Training and assessment
      • Chapter 5—Completion
      • Chapter 6—Regulatory compliance and governance practice
      • Appendix 1—Index to Standards/clauses as referenced in the users’ guide
      • Self-assessment tool
    • ASQA delegations
    • More support
  • ESOS providers
    Close
    ESOS providers
    • What is an ESOS provider?
    • How to become an ESOS provider
      • Prepare your ESOS application
      • Submit your application
      • How we assess ESOS applications
      • ESOS application decision
    • ESOS requirements
      • Legislative obligations
      • Quality of training experience
      • Maintaining your registration
      • Reporting obligations summary
      • Provider default obligations
      • Education agents
      • Tuition fee obligations
    • English-language courses (ELICOS)
    • Change ESOS registration
      • Change ESOS registration | Documentation requirements
      • Change ESOS registration | Fees
      • Change ESOS registration | Application process
    • Renew registration
    • Change CRICOS details
    • How we process applications
    • Withdraw registration
    • More support
  • Course accreditation
    Close
    Course accreditation
    • What is an accredited course?
    • Apply for course accreditation
      • Step 1—VET course concept
      • Step 2—Course development
      • Step 3—Course submission
      • Step 4—Application assessment
      • Step 5—Decision
      • Users’ guide to developing a course document
    • Manage a course
      • Amend a course
      • Cancel a course
      • Extend a course
    • Renew a course
      • Step 1—Intention to renew
      • Step 2—Course redevelopment
      • Step 3—Submit course renewal
      • Step 4—Application assessment (renewal)
      • Step 5—Decision (renewal)
    • Course owner responsibilities
    • Users’ guide to the Standards for VET Accredited Courses
      • Foreword
      • About the Standards
      • About this guide
      • National course document template
      • Standards
      • Accredited courses guide appendices
    • More support—Course accreditation
  • Training package assurance
  • Students
    Close
    Students
    • How ASQA can help students
    • Choosing a course and provider
    • Provider closures
    • Student records
    • Complaints about providers
    • More support
      • Courses and providers
  • Guidance & resources
    Close
    Guidance & resources
    • Focus on compliance - Spotlight On
      • Series 1 | Trainers and assessors
      • Series 2 | Assessment Validation
      • Series 3 | Assessment
      • Series 4 | Student support
    • Third-party agreements
      • Third-party written agreements
      • Third-party agreements for VET in schools
    • Annual declaration on compliance
    • Practical training and assessment
    • Online learning
      • Planning online learning
      • Marketing and enrolment for online learning
      • Online student support
      • Online training and assessment
    • ESOS Return to Compliance for face to face training
    • Managing natural disaster and pandemics
    • Resources
      • Users' guide to Standards for RTOs 2015
      • Users’ guide to developing a course document
      • Accredited Course Standards Guide
      • Fact sheets
      • FAQs
      • Forms
      • Guidance for Providers
      • Guides and tools
      • Presentations
      • Publications
      • Videos and webinars
  • How we regulate
    Close
    How we regulate
    • Our approach
    • Risk-based regulation
    • Regulatory priorities
      • ASQA's regulatory risk priorities 2022-23
      • Setting our Regulatory Risk Priorities
    • Self-assurance
      • Towards self-assurance
      • Draft model for self-assurance
      • Building a shared understanding of self-assurance
    • Strategic reviews
      • Past strategic reviews
    • Our regulatory practice
    • How we engage and educate
      • Provider Roundtable
      • Stakeholder Liaison Group
      • Consultation
    • Performance assessment (audit)
      • How to prepare for a performance assessment
      • During your performance assessment
      • After your performance assessment: If you’re compliant
      • After your performance assessment: If you’re non-compliant
    • Provider profiles
  • About us
    Close
    About us
    • ASQA overview
      • Our role
      • Our values
      • Key legislation
      • Our leadership and organisation
      • National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Advisory Council
      • Work with us
    • VET sector overview
      • National register of VET
      • Training Package Assurance
      • Training packages
    • Fees and charges
      • Current ASQA fees and charges
      • Annual registration charge
      • Transition arrangements
      • Cost Recovery Implementation Statement (CRIS)
      • How we consult on fees and charges
      • ELICOS fee relief
    • Reporting and accountability
      • Annual reports
      • Corporate Plan
      • Gifts and benefits register
      • Consultation
      • Service standards
      • Surveys
      • Corporate publications
      • Privacy policy
      • APS employee census results
      • Financial reporting
      • Freedom of information
      • Harradine report
      • Information publication scheme
      • Child Safety Policy
    • Contact us
      • Office locations
    • Complaints
      • Complaints about training providers
      • Complaints about ASQA
      • More support
    • Using this website
      • Accessibility
      • Disclaimer
      • Site map
      • Copyright
  • Contact us
  • News & Events
  • Complaints
Standards
  • Standard 9 – Duplication
  • Standard 10.1 – Stakeholder consultation
  • Standard 10.2 and 10.3 – Enterprise units of competency
  • Standard 10.4 – Modules
  • Standard 10.5 – Australian Qualifications Framework levels
  • Standard 10.6 – Foundation skills
  • Standard 10.7 – Industry recognition and licensing
  • Standard 10.8 – Course packaging rules
  • Standard 10.9 – Course exit points
  • Standard 10.10 – Education pathways and articulation
  • Standard 10.11 – Entry requirements
  • Standard 10.12 – Course assessment strategy
  • Standard 10.13 – Delivery modes
  • Standard 10.14 – Specialist facilities and resources
  • Standard 10.15 – Course monitoring and evaluation
  • Home
  • Course accreditation
  • Users’ guide to Standards for VET Accredited Courses
  • Standards
  • Standard 9 – Duplication

Standard 9 – Duplication

VET accredited courses must not duplicate by title or coverage the outcomes of an endorsed Training Package, skill set or accredited course.

Standard 9 relates to Section B: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1 of the National course document template.

As accredited VET courses are developed to meet vocational skill requirements not already covered in nationally endorsed VET training packages, ASQA cannot accredit or renew a course if the proposed course outcomes are already covered by a training package.

Standard 9 requires the course owner to make sure that the proposed course does not duplicate either the title or the outcomes of an existing training package, accredited course or skill set.

Australia currently has a number of endorsed training packages, developed by Industry Reference Committees to meet the training needs of an industry or group of industries. These packages consist of qualifications, skill sets and units of competency.

It is important to check that none of these provide the same outcomes as your proposed VET accredited course. A good way to research existing training package outcomes is to search key words on the national register.

It is also possible that another accredited course may have already been developed, which provides the same outcomes as your proposed course. This does not necessarily prevent accreditation of your proposed course, but you may be able to use the existing course instead of developing a new one for accreditation. Some course owners agree to share or license their course to interested parties. You can contact the relevant course owner direct to find out if they are willing to licence their course to you. Course owner details are published on the national register.

Duplication of qualifications

Training packages often provide students with flexibility in the units of competency needed to gain a qualification. For example, the packaging rules, which set out what units of competency are needed to gain a particular qualification, may allow students to choose from a large selection of electives from another training package or accredited course.

It is important to take this into account when checking to make sure your proposed course does not duplicate existing training package outcomes.

ASQA cannot accredit a course if:

  • it provides the same outcomes that students could achieve through the packaging rules of a training package or accredited course, e.g. undertaking electives from another course
  • it is a subset of a single training package qualification that could be recognised through a statement of attainment (i.e. partial completion of the existing qualification)
  • it duplicates a training package qualification and includes additional units of competency from a training package or accredited course that could be recognised through a statement of attainment.

Duplication of units of competency

Training package units of competency often address transferrable skills that can be used across a range of different contexts and courses. For example, a communication unit from the BSB Business Services Training Package could be used in many different courses. The training provider can then deliver the unit within the relevant context of their course or industry, while still maintaining the unit’s integrity.

Some training package implementation guides include rules that advise training providers how to contextualise training and assessment of units of competency from that package.

The ‘application’ section of a training package unit of competency, published on the national register, may also include information on whether the unit is suitable for cross-sector training and assessment.

Providing evidence with your application

The application for accreditation (initial or renewal) requires you to describe the process undertaken to ensure the proposed course does not duplicate training package content.

Case study – Avoiding training package development duplication for a proposed course

Queensland Mines Rescue Service Limited would like to develop a course in Underground Coal Mines Emergency Response and Rescue.

The organisation reviews the National Register to identify qualifications, skills sets and units of competency that may achieve the same outcome. It finds the following products that require further investigation.

Qualifications

  • RII30719 Certificate III in Emergency Response and Rescue

Units of competency:

  • HLTAID011 Provide first aid
  • PUATES001 Work in a team
  • RIIERR302E Respond to local emergencies and incidents
  • RIIERR201E Conduct fire team operations
  • PUAFIR207 Operate breathing apparatus open circuit
  • RIIERR303E Operate in self-contained regenerative oxygen breathing apparatus
  • RIIERR305E Control underground fires
  • RIIERR306E Conduct underground searches
  • RIIEERR307E Extricate casualties from underground incidents
  • RIIERR309D Establish and operate from fresh air base

Queensland Mines Rescue Service Limited conducts a thorough investigation into whether the training package qualification is a suitable training product to meet its needs, but identifies the qualification does not address the specialist skills and knowledge required by emergency response team members in an underground coal mine environment.

The organisation determines that the training package units of competency relate to the intended outcomes of its proposed course and are suitable for inclusion. But it also identified that some additional units (enterprise units) specifically related to underground coal mine response and rescue needed to be developed.

Once Queensland Mines Rescue Service Limited have developed the packaging rules for the course, it continues with its consultation and validation activities to confirm the proposed course does not duplicate training package outcomes.  The organisation conducted consultation and validation activities including  reviewing and gathering feedback on the course content from the relevant IRC and key stakeholders including major employers, union representatives and industry regulators. As a result the organisation restructured the course, removing some units and developing new ones. The organisation provided evidence of these activities in the form of copies of emails, minutes of meetings, letters of support, marked- up copies of the course description including enterprise units of competency showing suggested changes. 

Note: This case is modelled on the current accredited course 10876NAT Certificate III in Underground Coal Mines Emergency Response and Rescue. The course owner, Queensland Mines Rescue Service Limited granted permission for ASQA to use this information.


Additional resources

  • Training.gov.au – the register of nationally endorsed training package qualifications, units of competency and accredited courses in Australia.
Was this page helpful?

Share

Print
Australian Government Australian Skills Quality Authority
Logo Working Together

Footer

  • RTOs
  • Guidance & Resources
  • How we regulate
  • About Us
  • CRICOS
  • RTO standards
  • Our regulatory practice
  • Contact us
  • Students
  • Course accreditation
  • Privacy
  • Using this website

Subscribe to our newsletter

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
Logo Working Together
Flag TI Aboriginal flag

The Australian Skills Quality Authority acknowledges the traditional owners and custodians of country throughout Australia and acknowledges their continuing connection to land, sea and community. We pay our respects to the people, the cultures and the elders past, present and emerging.