Skip to main content
  • RTO Standards Guide
  • Accredited Course Standards Guide
  • asqanet
  • asqaconnect
Australian Government Australian Skills Quality Authority
  • Contact us
  • News & Events
  • Complaints

Main navigation

  • RTOs
    Close
    RTOs
    • What is an RTO?
    • How to become an RTO
      • Prepare your RTO application
      • Submit your RTO registration application
      • How we assess RTO applications
      • RTO application decision
    • Renew RTO registration
      • How to renew your registration
      • How we assess your registration renewal
    • Change RTO scope
      • Change RTO scope | Add training products
      • Change RTO scope | TAE Training Package evidence
      • Change RTO scope | Application process
      • Change RTO scope | Remove training products
      • When training products change
    • Withdraw registration
    • Requirements and responsibilities
      • Complying with legislation
      • Complying with ASQA requirements
      • Qualifications and statements of attainment
      • Data collection and provision
      • Other licensing and registration requirements
    • Change RTO details
      • Change business address
      • Change key staff or their contact details
      • Change legal or business name
      • Change scope of registration
      • Change to financial status
      • Change to legal entity type, ownership, and mergers
      • Changes due to COVID-19
      • Keep delivery locations updated
    • Focus on compliance - Spotlight On
      • Series 1 | Trainers and assessors
      • Series 2 | Assessment Validation
      • Series 3 | Assessment
      • Series 4 | Student support
    • Users’ guide to the Standards for RTOs 2015
      • Introduction to the RTO standards users' guide
      • Chapter 1—Marketing and recruitment
      • Chapter 2—Enrolment
      • Chapter 3—Support and progression
      • Chapter 4—Training and assessment
      • Chapter 5—Completion
      • Chapter 6—Regulatory compliance and governance practice
      • Appendix 1—Index to Standards/clauses as referenced in the users’ guide
      • Self-assessment tool
    • ASQA delegations
    • More support
  • ESOS providers
    Close
    ESOS providers
    • What is an ESOS provider?
    • How to become an ESOS provider
      • Prepare your ESOS application
      • Submit your application
      • How we assess ESOS applications
      • ESOS application decision
    • ESOS requirements
      • Legislative obligations
      • Quality of training experience
      • Maintaining your registration
      • Reporting obligations summary
      • Provider default obligations
      • Education agents
      • Tuition fee obligations
    • English-language courses (ELICOS)
    • Change ESOS registration
      • Change ESOS registration | Documentation requirements
      • Change ESOS registration | Fees
      • Change ESOS registration | Application process
    • Renew registration
    • Change CRICOS details
    • How we process applications
    • Withdraw registration
    • More support
  • Course accreditation
    Close
    Course accreditation
    • What is an accredited course?
    • Apply for course accreditation
      • Step 1—VET course concept
      • Step 2—Course development
      • Step 3—Course submission
      • Step 4—Application assessment
      • Step 5—Decision
      • Users’ guide to developing a course document
    • Manage a course
      • Amend a course
      • Cancel a course
      • Extend a course
    • Renew a course
      • Step 1—Intention to renew
      • Step 2—Course redevelopment
      • Step 3—Submit course renewal
      • Step 4—Application assessment (renewal)
      • Step 5—Decision (renewal)
    • Course owner responsibilities
    • Users’ guide to the Standards for VET Accredited Courses
      • Foreword
      • About the Standards
      • About this guide
      • National course document template
      • Standards
      • Accredited courses guide appendices
    • More support—Course accreditation
  • Training package assurance
  • Students
    Close
    Students
    • How ASQA can help students
    • Choosing a course and provider
    • Provider closures
    • Student records
    • Complaints about providers
    • More support
      • Courses and providers
  • Guidance & resources
    Close
    Guidance & resources
    • Focus on compliance - Spotlight On
      • Series 1 | Trainers and assessors
      • Series 2 | Assessment Validation
      • Series 3 | Assessment
      • Series 4 | Student support
    • Third-party agreements
      • Third-party written agreements
      • Third-party agreements for VET in schools
    • Annual declaration on compliance
    • Practical training and assessment
    • Online learning
      • Planning online learning
      • Marketing and enrolment for online learning
      • Online student support
      • Online training and assessment
    • ESOS Return to Compliance for face to face training
    • Managing natural disaster and pandemics
    • Resources
      • Users' guide to Standards for RTOs 2015
      • Users’ guide to developing a course document
      • Accredited Course Standards Guide
      • Fact sheets
      • FAQs
      • Forms
      • Guidance for Providers
      • Guides and tools
      • Presentations
      • Publications
      • Videos and webinars
  • How we regulate
    Close
    How we regulate
    • Our approach
    • Risk-based regulation
    • Regulatory priorities
      • ASQA's regulatory risk priorities 2022-23
      • Setting our Regulatory Risk Priorities
    • Self-assurance
      • Towards self-assurance
      • Draft model for self-assurance
      • Building a shared understanding of self-assurance
    • Strategic reviews
      • Past strategic reviews
    • Our regulatory practice
    • How we engage and educate
      • Provider Roundtable
      • Stakeholder Liaison Group
      • Consultation
    • Performance assessment (audit)
      • How to prepare for a performance assessment
      • During your performance assessment
      • After your performance assessment: If you’re compliant
      • After your performance assessment: If you’re non-compliant
    • Provider profiles
  • About us
    Close
    About us
    • ASQA overview
      • Our role
      • Our values
      • Key legislation
      • Our leadership and organisation
      • National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Advisory Council
      • Work with us
    • VET sector overview
      • National register of VET
      • Training Package Assurance
      • Training packages
    • Fees and charges
      • Current ASQA fees and charges
      • Annual registration charge
      • Transition arrangements
      • Cost Recovery Implementation Statement (CRIS)
      • How we consult on fees and charges
      • ELICOS fee relief
    • Reporting and accountability
      • Annual reports
      • Corporate Plan
      • Gifts and benefits register
      • Consultation
      • Service standards
      • Surveys
      • Corporate publications
      • Privacy policy
      • APS employee census results
      • Financial reporting
      • Freedom of information
      • Harradine report
      • Information publication scheme
      • Child Safety Policy
    • Contact us
      • Office locations
    • Complaints
      • Complaints about training providers
      • Complaints about ASQA
      • More support
    • Using this website
      • Accessibility
      • Disclaimer
      • Site map
      • Copyright
  • Contact us
  • News & Events
  • Complaints
Standards
  • Standard 9 – Duplication
  • Standard 10.1 – Stakeholder consultation
  • Standard 10.2 and 10.3 – Enterprise units of competency
  • Standard 10.4 – Modules
  • Standard 10.5 – Australian Qualifications Framework levels
  • Standard 10.6 – Foundation skills
  • Standard 10.7 – Industry recognition and licensing
  • Standard 10.8 – Course packaging rules
  • Standard 10.9 – Course exit points
  • Standard 10.10 – Education pathways and articulation
  • Standard 10.11 – Entry requirements
  • Standard 10.12 – Course assessment strategy
  • Standard 10.13 – Delivery modes
  • Standard 10.14 – Specialist facilities and resources
  • Standard 10.15 – Course monitoring and evaluation
  • Home
  • Course accreditation
  • Users’ guide to Standards for VET Accredited Courses
  • Standards
  • Standard 10.12 – Course assessment strategy

Standard 10.12 – Course assessment strategy

VET accredited courses must include course assessment strategies which:
  • are valid, reliable, flexible and fair
  • support the collection of evidence that is sufficient, valid, authentic and current
  • are consistent with assessment requirements in the relevant training package(s) where nationally endorsed units of competency are used
  • are consistent with the assessment requirement in the relevant VET accredited course where units from an accredited course are used
  • ensure that workplace and regulatory requirements, where relevant, are met, and
  • identify and justify any requirements for workplace and/or simulated assessment.

This Standard relates to Section B: 6.1 of the National course document template.

This part of the course document requires you to outline the approach to assessment and evidence-gathering that should be followed by a training provider delivering your course.

The assessment strategy should provide a general overview that will guide training providers when developing their assessment strategy. This will not be the same as the training provider’s specific strategy for implementing the course.

You should describe how the assessment approach will ensure that a training provider’s assessor can make sound judgements about student competency and achievement of course outcomes.

Your course’s assessment strategy may contain ‘mandated’ and/or ‘suggested’ requirements for assessment of the units of competency. Keep in mind that mandated requirements apply not only to delivery of the course by the course owner but to all training providers that may enter into a licensing arrangement with the course owner. As such it is important to avoid writing the assessment strategy based on a particular training provider’s strategy.

Mandated requirements should match the information provided in the assessment requirements template for all units that make up the course.

Students will be assessed against all the tasks required by each unit. They need to be able to demonstrate that they can perform these tasks to an acceptable level, and that they have all the required skill and knowledge identified in the unit assessment requirements.

Your assessment strategy should also clearly identify any workplace and/or regulatory requirements (such as legislative requirements) so that training providers can develop their assessment strategies, tools or processes to meet these requirements.

Where units of competency are imported from a training package, the information in your assessment strategy must match the assessment guidelines in the parent training package and its implementation guide.

If units of competency are imported from another VET accredited course, the information in your assessment strategy should match the assessment guidelines in that course.

Training providers are required to conduct assessment in accordance with the Principles of Assessment and the Rules of Evidence from the Standards for Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) 2015 (Table 1.8-1 and 1.8-2). These principles are set out in Appendices 5 and 6 to this Guide.

Case study – Describing an accredited course assessment strategy

Section B: 6.1 Assessment Strategy in the National course document template.

The assessment strategy for this course includes:

  • Assessment of practical skills must be conducted via direct observation in a simulated environment.  The simulated environment must reflect actual workplace and industry conditions.
  • Knowledge requirements must be assessed via oral/written questions and role plays. Oral/written questioning will be used to elicit a broad range of general and specific underpinning knowledge. Written questioning will include both multiple choice and short answer questions.
  • Workplace observed practice.  Workplace activities must be signed off by a peer for validation by the assessor. A report will be supplied by a member of staff that works in the primary healthcare setting in which the participant is undertaking the course, typically this will be the General Practitioner or Registered Nurse. GP/RN roles will include agreeing to support and engage with the participant, to create and provide a positive learning environment within the workplace for the duration of the course.

All assessment strategies for this course are mandated.

The assessment incorporates all unit requirements, including the specific performance evidence and knowledge evidence.

All workplace observed activities must be undertaken in accordance with workplace policies and procedures of the facility where the activity is being conducted.

Note: This case is modelled on the current accredited course 10754NAT Course in Immunisation Practice in Primary Healthcare. Permission for ASQA to use this information from the accredited course was provided by the course owner, The Benchmarque Group Pty Ltd.

Case study – Describing an accredited course assessment strategy

(Section B: 6.1 Assessment Strategy in the National course document template.)

The strategy must enable the student to demonstrate their practical skills in a real work environment over a period of time to provide sufficient judgement opportunities.

Practical skill assessments must be conducted by direct observation by the training provider assessor.

Assessment of knowledge may be conducted in the form of:

  • oral questioning
  • practical demonstration
  • direct observation
  • written tasks and assignments
  • theoretical examination
  • third-party evidence.

Assessment of skills must take place under the following conditions:

  • in a therapeutic equine program which may include:
  • therapeutic riding or diving
  • equine facilitated health and well-being programs
  • unmounted equine programs.

Skills must be demonstrated in an environment that meets the requirements of the Code of Practice – Managing risks when new or inexperienced riders or handlers interact with horses in the workplace.

Demonstrations may include individuals without disability if the student is able to demonstrate the application of their skills and knowledge sufficiently. In the case where a wheelchair user is required, the use of a person without disability will enable practical assessment of students to go ahead if there is not a wheelchair user available. This will ensure that the student or training provider is not disadvantaged.

Assessment in a workplace environment is a mandatory requirement due to the complex nature of the operating environment which includes horses, individuals with disability or impairment, support assistants and horses. The assessment must ensure that a student is able to meet performance criteria of enterprise units and respond to immediate hazards. This cannot be simulated in a classroom or role play without the use of horses and people in an equine environment.

Note: This case is modelled on the current accredited course 10776NAT Certificate III in Equine Therapy Programs for People with Disabilities. Permission for ASQA to use this information from the accredited course was provided by the course owner, Riding for the Disabled Association (NSW).

Case study – Describing an accredited course assessment strategy

(Section B: 6.1 in the National course document template.)

Assessment must be conducted in accordance with the requirements for assessment described within the Standards for Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) 2015.

Enterprise units of competency:

Each unit must be assessed in accordance with the requirements of the assessment conditions section of each unit. For example there must be demonstrated evidence the student has completed the following tasks:

  • maintained at least 2 bolt action rifles safely and in accordance with authorised instructions and organisational procedures
  • diagnosed and repaired a fault in at least 2 different component parts of one or more bolt action rifle safely and in accordance with authorised instructions and organisational procedures.

Skills must be demonstrated in an authorised and licensed weapon repair facility.

Assessment in a simulated environment:

If assessment cannot take place in a workplace for reasons of safety or access to equipment and resources, a simulated environment may be used to provide the full range of contexts and situations. Simulated assessment environments must simulate the real-life working environment where the skills and knowledge of the unit would be performed, with all the relevant equipment and resources of that working environment.

A training provider should ensure any simulated environment used provides opportunities for students to:

  • test the full range skills and knowledge
  • use up to date equipment and resources
  • reflect time pressures and deadlines
  • show the complexity of dealing with multiple tasks
  • involve prioritising among competing tasks
  • deal with clients, including difficult ones
  • work with others in a team, if relevant
  • communicate with diverse groups, if relevant
  • find, discuss and test solutions to problems
  • explore health and safety issues
  • answer practically oriented, applied knowledge questions; and
  • show the level of written and verbal expression sufficient for, but not exceeding, the work requirements.

Skills must be demonstrated over time and in a variety of situations.

There are no prescribed methods of assessment for the units of competency. A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. Such methods may include:

  • written and/or oral presentations
  • portfolios of evidence, including work samples
  • written and/or oral questions
  • direct observation
  • demonstration of skills
  • role plays.

An assessment strategy designed with reference to the above will contribute to a valid, reliable, flexible and fair assessment approach which will facilitate consistency with the assessment requirements of the course and support the collection of sufficient, valid, reliable and authentic evidence.

Note: This case is modelled on the current accredited course 10925NAT Certificate IV Small Arms Weapon Maintenance.  Permission for ASQA to use this information from the accredited course was provided by the course owner, Thales Australia Pty Ltd.

Was this page helpful?

Share

Print
Australian Government Australian Skills Quality Authority
Logo Working Together

Footer

  • RTOs
  • Guidance & Resources
  • How we regulate
  • About Us
  • CRICOS
  • RTO standards
  • Our regulatory practice
  • Contact us
  • Students
  • Course accreditation
  • Privacy
  • Using this website

Subscribe to our newsletter

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
Logo Working Together
Flag TI Aboriginal flag

The Australian Skills Quality Authority acknowledges the traditional owners and custodians of country throughout Australia and acknowledges their continuing connection to land, sea and community. We pay our respects to the people, the cultures and the elders past, present and emerging.