Skip to main content
  • RTO Standards Guide
  • Accredited Course Standards Guide
  • asqanet
  • asqaconnect
Australian Government Australian Skills Quality Authority

Main navigation

  • RTOs
    Close
    RTOs
    • What is an RTO?
    • How to become an RTO
      • Prepare your RTO application
      • Submit your RTO registration application
      • How we assess RTO applications
      • RTO application decision
    • Renew RTO registration
      • How to renew your registration
      • How we assess your registration renewal
    • Change RTO scope
      • Change RTO scope | Add training products
      • Change RTO scope | TAE Training Package evidence
      • Change RTO scope | Application process
      • Change RTO scope | Remove training products
      • When training products change
    • Withdraw registration
    • Requirements and responsibilities
      • Complying with legislation
      • Complying with ASQA requirements
      • Qualifications and statements of attainment
      • Data collection and provision
      • Other licensing and registration requirements
    • Change RTO details
      • Change business address
      • Change key staff or their contact details
      • Change legal or business name
      • Change scope of registration
      • Change to financial status
      • Change to legal entity type, ownership, and mergers
      • Changes due to COVID-19
      • Keep delivery locations updated
    • Focus on compliance - Spotlight On
      • Series 1 | Trainers and assessors
      • Series 2 | Assessment Validation
      • Series 3 | Assessment
      • Series 4 | Student support
      • Series 5 | Marketing and advertising
    • Users’ guide to the Standards for RTOs 2015
      • Introduction to the RTO standards users' guide
      • Chapter 1—Marketing and recruitment
      • Chapter 2—Enrolment
      • Chapter 3—Support and progression
      • Chapter 4—Training and assessment
      • Chapter 5—Completion
      • Chapter 6—Regulatory compliance and governance practice
      • Appendix 1—Index to Standards/clauses as referenced in the users’ guide
      • Self-assessment tool
    • ASQA delegations
    • More support
  • ESOS providers
    Close
    ESOS providers
    • What is an ESOS provider?
    • How to become an ESOS provider
      • Prepare your ESOS application
      • Submit your application
      • How we assess ESOS applications
      • ESOS application decision
    • ESOS requirements
      • Education agents
      • Learner Transitions
      • Legislative obligations
      • Maintaining your registration
      • Obligations when facilitating student transfers
      • Overseas student attendance
      • Provider default obligations
      • Quality Indicators
      • Quality of training experience
      • Reporting obligations summary
      • Resourcing requirements—for applicants seeking initial registration or change to scope of registration
      • Retention requirements for completed student assessment items
      • Third party arrangements for training and/or assessment of VET courses
      • Written agreements with overseas students
    • English-language courses (ELICOS)
    • Change ESOS registration
      • Change ESOS registration | Application process
      • Change ESOS registration | Documentation requirements
      • Change ESOS registration | Fees
    • Renew registration
    • Change CRICOS details
    • How we process applications
    • Withdraw registration
    • More support
  • Course accreditation
    Close
    Course accreditation
    • What is an accredited course?
    • Apply for course accreditation
      • Step 1—VET course concept
      • Step 2—Course development
      • Step 3—Course submission
      • Step 4—Application assessment
      • Step 5—Decision
      • Users’ guide to developing a course document
    • Manage a course
      • Amend a course
      • Cancel a course
      • Extend a course
    • Renew a course
      • Step 1—Intention to renew
      • Step 2—Course redevelopment
      • Step 3—Submit course renewal
      • Step 4—Application assessment (renewal)
      • Step 5—Decision (renewal)
    • Course owner responsibilities
    • Users’ guide to the Standards for VET Accredited Courses
      • Foreword
      • About the Standards
      • About this guide
      • National course document template
      • Standards
      • Accredited courses guide appendices
    • More support—Course accreditation
  • Students
    Close
    Students
    • How ASQA can help students
    • Choosing a course and provider
    • Provider closures
    • Student records
    • Complaints about providers
    • More support
      • Courses and providers
  • Guidance & resources
    Close
    Guidance & resources
    • Focus on compliance - Spotlight On
      • Series 1 | Trainers and assessors
      • Series 2 | Assessment Validation
      • Series 3 | Assessment
      • Series 4 | Student support
      • Series 5 | Marketing and advertising
    • Online learning
      • Planning online learning
      • Marketing and enrolment for online learning
      • Online student support
      • Online training and assessment
    • Resources
      • Users' guide to Standards for RTOs 2015
      • Users’ guide to developing a course document
      • Accredited Course Standards Guide
      • Fact sheets
      • FAQs
      • Forms
      • Guidance for Providers
      • Guides and tools
      • Presentations
      • Publications
      • Videos and webinars
    • Third-party agreements
      • Third-party written agreements
      • Third-party agreements for VET in schools
    • ESOS requirements
      • ESOS Return to Compliance for face to face training
    • Annual declaration on compliance
    • Practical training and assessment
    • Managing natural disaster and pandemics
  • How we regulate
    Close
    How we regulate
    • Our approach
    • Risk-based regulation
    • Risk priorities
      • Student work placement
      • Academic integrity
      • Online delivery
      • Shortened course duration
      • Recognition of prior learning
      • VET workforce capability
      • International delivery
      • Governance through change
      • Setting our risk priorities
      • Previous risk priority and strategy documents
    • Self-assurance
      • Towards self-assurance
      • Draft model for self-assurance
    • Strategic reviews
      • Past strategic reviews
    • Our regulatory practice
      • Record of decisions prior to 1st March 2021
    • How we engage and educate
      • Provider Roundtable
      • Stakeholder Liaison Group
      • Consultation
    • Performance assessment (audit)
      • How to prepare for a performance assessment
      • During your performance assessment
      • After your performance assessment: If you’re compliant
      • After your performance assessment: If you’re non-compliant
    • Provider profiles
  • About us
    Close
    About us
    • ASQA overview
      • Our role
      • Our values
      • Key legislation
      • Our leadership and organisation
      • National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Advisory Council
      • Work with us
    • VET sector overview
      • National register of VET
      • Training packages
    • Fees and charges
      • Current ASQA fees and charges
      • Annual registration charge
      • Transition arrangements
      • Cost Recovery Implementation Statement (CRIS)
      • How we consult on fees and charges
      • ELICOS fee relief
    • Reporting and accountability
      • Annual reports
      • Corporate Plan
      • Gifts and benefits register
      • Consultation
      • Service Charter and service standards
      • Surveys
      • Corporate publications
      • Privacy policy
      • APS employee census results
      • Financial reporting
      • Freedom of information
      • Vulnerability Disclosure Statement
      • Harradine report
      • Information publication scheme
      • Child Safety Policy
    • Contact us
      • Office locations
    • Complaints
      • Complaints about training providers
      • Complaints about ASQA
      • More support
    • Using this website
      • Accessibility
      • Disclaimer
      • Site map
      • Copyright
  • Home
  • RTOs
  • Users' guide to Standards for RTOs 2015
  • Introduction
  • FAQs
  • Assessment validation

Assessment validation

  • Are there any particular training products that need to be validated more frequently?

    ASQA has identified systemic risks with training in the following areas: equine, security, early childhood education and care, aged and community care, construction industry (‘white card’ training) and training and education (TAE). For the purpose of Clause 1.10, training products in these areas may need to be validated more frequently.

  • Can I validate my training products more often than every five years? (Clauses 1.9 – 1.11)

    The validation requirements in the Standards are the minimum requirements your RTO must meet.

    However, you may choose to validate your training products more frequently, particularly if you are operating in a dynamic industry environment, where emerging risk factors have been identified or where new assessment tools have been developed.

  • How many units per qualification should be validated?

    At least two units from each qualification must be validated; however, your RTO may choose to validate more if validation of the two units identifies risks or a potential harm to learners who may not have met the required assessment outcomes, inconsistent assessment judgements have been made by assessors or assessment has not been conducted in accordance with the Principles of Assessment or the Rules of Evidence.

  • I am the only trainer/assessor in our small RTO. How do I meet the requirement of clause 1.11, which states ‘validation must be undertaken by one or more persons who are not directly involved in the particular instance of delivery and assessment.’

    The validation process involves:

    • checking a statistically valid sample of completed student assessment tools has produced valid, reliable, sufficient, current and authentic evidence, and if required, making recommendations for future improvements to the assessment tool, process or outcome and acting upon those recommendations.

    The trainer and assessor who delivered/assessed the training product being validated:

    • can participate in the validation process as part of a team
    • cannot conduct the validation on his/her own
    • cannot determine the validation outcome for any assessment judgements they made, and
    • cannot be the lead validator in the assessment team.

    If a sole trainer and assessor is involved in training and/or assessing a learner whose completed assessment is used in the validation sample, it would be considered, that trainer and assessor would have been ‘directly involved in the particular instance of delivery and assessment’.

    In this case, the trainer and assessor can still participate in the validation process; however, cannot decide the validation outcomes of their own assessment decisions. A trainer and assessor can work as part of a validation team. 

  • I work for a small RTO and am also the only trainer and assessor in my specific industry area. How can our RTO validate assessments? (Clauses 1.9 – 1.11)

    You may undertake validation through a ‘team’ approach, where collectively, team members hold the required qualifications, skills and knowledge. Trainers and assessors who are involved in the training and assessment delivery being considered as part of the validation process may also participate in validation activities, as long as they are not directly involved in deciding the validation outcome for their assessment decisions.

    In selecting a validation team, choose a lead validator who is independent of delivery and assessment of the training product being validated and the assessment judgements being considered, to maintain professional distance and integrity.

    Combined, the people involved in validation must have:

    • appropriate vocational competencies
    • current industry skills and knowledge
    • an appropriate training and assessment qualification or assessor skill set, and
    • current knowledge and skills in vocational teaching and learning.
  • What does ‘not directly involved in the particular instance of delivery and assessment’ mean? (Clauses 1.9 - 1.11)

    The validation process involves:

    • checking a statistically valid sample of completed student assessment tool/s produced valid, reliable, sufficient, current and authentic evidence, and
    • if required, making recommendations for future improvements to the assessment tool, process or outcome and acting upon those recommendations.

    If a learner’s completed assessment tool is used in the validation sample, any trainer or assessor involved in training and/or assessing that learner is considered to be is ‘directly involved’. These trainers and assessors can participate in the validation process; however, they cannot decide the validation outcomes of their own assessment decisions.

  • What is the difference between validation and moderation? (Clauses 1.9 - 1.11)

    A valid assessment judgement is one that confirms a learner holds all of the knowledge and skills described in the training package or accredited course.

    Validation is a process to confirm that your RTO’s assessment system is able to consistently produce valid assessment judgements.

    Validation is the quality review of the assessment process and is generally conducted after assessment is complete.

    Validation involves checking that your assessment tools have produced valid, reliable, sufficient, current and authentic evidence, enabling your RTO to make reasonable judgements to about whether training package (or VET accredited course) requirements have been met.

    Validation includes reviewing a statistically valid sample of the assessments and making recommendations for future improvements to the assessment tool, process and/or outcomes and acting upon such recommendations.

    A statistically valid sample is one that is taken randomly from the set of assessment judgements being considered and that is sufficiently large that the outcomes of validation of the sample can be applied to the entire set of judgements. There are a number of online tools you can use to generate the size of your sample, one of which is ASQA’s validation sample size calculator.

    Moderation is a quality control process aimed at bringing assessment judgements into alignment. Moderation is generally conducted before the finalisation of student results as it ensures the same decisions are applied to all assessment results within the same unit of competency.

    The requirement in the Standards to undertake validation of assessment judgements does not prohibit your RTO from undertaking moderation activities, or any other process aimed at increasing the quality of assessment.

  • Who can be an independent validator?

    An independent validator is someone who is:

    • not employed or subcontracted by the RTO to provide training and assessment, and
    • has no other involvement or interest in the operations of the RTO.
  • Was this page helpful?

    Share

    Print
    Australian Government Australian Skills Quality Authority
    Logo Working Together

    Footer

    • RTOs
    • Guidance & Resources
    • How we regulate
    • About Us
    • CRICOS
    • RTO standards
    • Our regulatory practice
    • Contact us
    • Students
    • Course accreditation
    • Privacy
    • Using this website

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Logo Working Together
    Aboriginal flag Flag TI

    The Australian Skills Quality Authority acknowledges the traditional owners and custodians of country throughout Australia and acknowledges their continuing connection to land, sea and community. We pay our respects to the people, the cultures and the elders past, present and emerging.