On this page
We use a risk-based approach to determine the most significant risks to achieving ASQA’s purpose, which is to ensure quality VET and the integrity of national qualifications issued by training providers.
This approach recognises that we cannot mitigate every risk, so we use a rigorous process to determine our risk priorities.
We conduct extensive research and synthesise data and information from a range of sources to understand what the greatest risks to the VET and ELICOS sectors are.
We call this an environmental scan and the insights we gain from this process are invaluable.
The scan involves a combination of surveys; face to face interviews; engagement with a range of stakeholder groups. This includes consulting with providers; industry and sector peak bodies, state and territory governments; and analysing regulatory data and data from other sources.
Regulatory Risk Priorities 2025-26
ASQA is the national regulator overseeing the vocational education and training (VET) sector in Australia. Our purpose is to ensure quality VET so that students, industry, governments and the community can have confidence in the integrity of national qualifications issued by training providers.
We use an intelligence-based and data-driven approach to identify the most significant risks to the integrity of national qualifications and ensure quality VET outcomes for students, industry and the broader community. We make full use of our regulatory powers to take action and ensure best practice.
Environmental scan on regulatory risk
A central component of our approach is our annual environmental scan (e-scan). We consult closely with key stakeholder groups to identify the key risks, both ongoing and emerging, to the VET sector. We then undertake further research to contextualise those risks into themes and adjust our regulatory risk priorities accordingly.
A risk theme, in the context of the e-scan, describes a recurring pattern of challenges, behaviours or concerns that have the potential to impact the sector’s reputation, integrity, market health or student educational outcomes. Identified risks are grouped within themes to better reflect their multi-dimensional nature and the dynamic interaction between risks within the VET sector.
The overarching risks identified in the 2025 Environmental Scan are largely consistent with those recognised in 2024 and continue to align with existing RRPs in 2024-25. However, as the nature and complexity of the identified risks are continually evolving, the 2025 Environmental Scan has been drafted to reflect these developments.
The 2025 Environmental Scan has identified six deeply interconnected risks. When compared to the 2024 Environmental Scan:
- Six risks themes: Shortened Course Duration; Student Work Placement; Non-genuine providers and Bad Faith Operators; Recognition of Prior Learning; Academic Integrity; Marketing, Recruitment and Delivery of International Education
- One risk has been removed (Online Delivery). However, the ongoing concern relating to the volume of learning in some online offerings is now addressed in Shortened Course Duration.
Risks in Industries
The risks identified in our e-scan are particularly prevalent within 3 industry areas including:
- Early Childhood Education and Care
- Aviation
- High Risk Work Licensing industries.
We will be undertaking campaigns targeted to these industries to detect, mitigate and address the risks posed.
How we prioritise
Our process of prioritising the risks we identify involves analysing the risks in different ways. These help us to determine where our regulatory effort will be best placed. Here are some examples of the tools we use.
We look at all of the risks we identify and consider them against these criteria.
We’re focusing on risks created by the COVID pandemic, technical change, new business models, and changes in consumer preferences or behaviours.
We’re focusing on areas where our research shows that we are likely to be able to achieve strong outcomes by leveraging an appropriate mix of stakeholder engagement, educative, compliance and enforcement tools.
We’re focusing on risks that affect a high number of providers, students or a large area. Another process we go through is to look at all of the risks we identify and consider whether they are provider risks or systemic risks. This helps us to ensure that we target a combination of both with our regulatory effort.
These are provider practices or behaviour that can present a risk to the quality of student outcomes and the reputation of the VET sector.
These are risks that are likely to affect a significant proportion of providers or relate to a particular cohort of providers across the VET sector or specific industry sector.
Our Intelligence Analysts use these and a variety of other tools to analyse and prioritise all of the potential risks to the VET and ELICOS sectors.
Previous risk priority and strategy documents
Our previous years documents are available to view below.
We update these priorities regularly to ensure we are responding to the most current issues in the sector. Over the years priorities may vary or stay the same, dependent on the risk drivers identified. We use a risk-based approach to determine the most significant risks to achieving our purpose, which is to ensure quality VET and the integrity of national qualifications issued by training providers.